#85 π 1975. Maximum Matrix Sum ππ§
Have you ever worked with numbers in a matrix and wondered how to manipulate them for maximum value? π This problem lets us explore a fascinating technique where flipping the signs of adjacent numbers helps us maximize the total matrix sum. Intriguing, right? Letβs dive into the mechanics, supported by plenty of explanations, examples, and edge cases to make sure you master it! πβ¨
The Problem in Simple Terms π
You are given an \(n \times n\) matrix where each element is an integer. You can perform the following operation as many times as you like:
- Select two adjacent elements (horizontally or vertically connected) and flip their signs, i.e., multiply each of them by \(-1\).
Your task is to find the maximum possible sum of the matrix after optimally applying this operation.
Why is This Problem Tricky? π€
At first glance, flipping adjacent numbers might seem overwhelming because of the many combinations possible.
- Which numbers should you flip?
- How do you decide whether flipping will increase the sum?
- Is there a mathematical shortcut to avoid brute force?
This problem challenges us to think logically and strategically. We need to shift our mindset from individual flips to understanding the bigger picture of how negatives and positives interact.
Key Observations π
Before jumping to a solution, letβs break down some critical insights:
1. The Goal is Maximization
The absolute values of numbers determine their potential contribution to the sum. For example:
- A positive \(5\) contributes \(+5\).
- A negative \(-5\), if flipped to \(5\), can contribute \(+5\) instead of \(-5\).
2. Flipping Negatives
- Negatives can be turned into positives by flipping.
- If negatives are adjacent, flipping both will leave them negative again.
- If two positives are adjacent, flipping them makes them negative, reducing the sum.
This means we must be selective in flipping negatives while ensuring that unnecessary flips do not hurt the total.
3. Theoretical Maximum
The ideal maximum sum is achieved when:
- All elements are positive.
- This happens when the matrix sum equals the sum of absolute values of all elements.
4. Dealing with Odd Negatives
If thereβs an odd number of negative numbers in the matrix, one negative will always remain. Why?
- Flipping an even number of negatives cancels them out entirely, turning all into positives.
- But an odd count leaves one unpaired negative, which will persist in the final matrix.
To deal with this, we need to minimize the penalty from this one unavoidable negative. The smallest absolute value becomes key, as it minimizes the impact of the leftover negative.
The Plan to Solve It π
- Calculate the sum of absolute values of all elements. This gives us the maximum theoretical sum.
- Count the total number of negative elements.
- Identify the smallest absolute value in the matrix.
- If the count of negatives is even, no penalty is applied, and we achieve the maximum sum.
- If the count is odd, subtract twice the smallest absolute value from the total to account for the one unavoidable negative since this leftover negative reduces the sum by \(2 \times min_abs\). 2Γmin_abs compared to the theoretical maximum (all positives).
This approach works because it balances the number of flips needed while ensuring the maximum sum is achieved efficiently.
Implementation in Python π»
Hereβs how the solution looks in Python:
def maxMatrixSum(matrix):
total_sum = 0
neg_count = 0
min_abs = float('inf') # Start with infinity for comparison
# Traverse the matrix
for row in matrix:
for value in row:
# Add absolute values to total_sum
total_sum += abs(value)
# Count negatives
if value < 0:
neg_count += 1
# Track smallest absolute value
min_abs = min(min_abs, abs(value))
# If the count of negatives is odd, adjust the result
if neg_count % 2 == 0:
return total_sum
else:
return total_sum - 2 * min_abs
Step-by-Step Walkthrough π οΈ
Letβs break it down with Example 1:
Input:
\(\text{matrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\)
Step 1: Compute Absolute Sum
- Absolute values: \(|1| + |-1| + |-1| + |1|\) = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4.
- So, \(\text{total_sum} = 4\).
Step 2: Count Negatives
- Number of negatives: \(-1, -1 \Rightarrow 2\).
Step 3: Smallest Absolute Value
- Smallest value: \(1\).
Step 4: Adjust for Odd Negatives
- Since \(2\) is even, no adjustment is needed.
Output: \(4\).
Now, letβs tackle Example 2, which is more complex.
Input:
\(\text{matrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\ -1 & -2 & -3 \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \end{bmatrix}\)
Step 1: Compute Absolute Sum
- Absolute values:
\(|1| + |2| + |3| + |-1| + |-2| + |-3| + |1| + |2| + |3| = 18\) - So, \(\text{total_sum} = 18\).
Step 2: Count Negatives
- Negatives: \(-1, -2, -3 \Rightarrow 3\).
Step 3: Smallest Absolute Value
- Smallest value: \(1\).
Step 4: Adjust for Odd Negatives
- Since \(3\) is odd, subtract \(2 \times 1\):
\(\text{Adjusted Sum} = 18 - 2 \cdot 1 = 16\)
Output: \(16\).
Edge Cases π§©
-
All Positives
Input:
\(\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\)
Output: \(10\).
Explanation: No negatives, so sum is already maximum. -
All Negatives
Input:
\(\begin{bmatrix} -1 & -2 \\ -3 & -4 \end{bmatrix}\)
Output: \(10\).
Explanation: All negatives can be flipped to positives. -
Single Negative
Input:
\(\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & -4 \end{bmatrix}\)
Output: \(10\).
Explanation: Only one negative, which is unavoidable.
Complexity Analysis β±οΈ
- Time Complexity: \(O(n^2)\) β Traverse each element in the \(n \times n\) matrix.
- Space Complexity: \(O(1)\) β Only constants are used.
Conclusion π
This problem beautifully illustrates how mathematical insight can simplify what seems like a complex task. By focusing on the absolute sum, negative counts, and smallest values, we crafted an efficient solution with just one traversal of the matrix.
Matrix manipulation problems like this sharpen your problem-solving skills and prepare you for more advanced challenges. Keep coding and conquering! π